I Have just been discussion crazy over the last couple days. Anyway, TechPresident.com has an interesting article about the implications of the Obama administration using a free, open-source content management system, Drupal, to build Recovery.gov. Of course, they are probably reading too much into but they discuss four implications:

1) Goes against the government standard of using proprietary software
2) Bolsters the credibility of open-source software as stable and reliable
3) Drupal’s underlying philosophy matches the Obama administration’s push for community building
4) Extends the White House’s web development from beyond just the new media consultant firm Blue States Digital

Full Article

Prof. Lessig, from Stanford and soon-to-be Harvard Law, is asking for help in the Shepard Fairey case from the general public.

The Fair Use Project at the Center for Internet and Society is representing artist Shepard Fairey, the artist who made the made the incredibly famous HOPE poster for the Obama campaign. This is a neat case to begin with and I would love to discuss it with some of you law-types*. But from an Internet, Law and Democracy standpoint, the case is getting more interesting. Over the last couple hours, Lawrence Lessig, though multiple Internet communication channels (e.g., his blog and Twitter), has asked the general public to help him with the case. From his blog:

“As mentioned, the Fair Use Project at Stanford’s CIS is representing Shepard Fairey in his suit against the AP. To that end, we’d be grateful for some net-based knowledge. How many photos are there “like” the beautiful photograph that Mannie Garcia took (the one on the left; the one on the right is a CC licensed photo taken by Steve Jurvetson)? Can you send any examples to shep_use@pobox.com?
Also, please send any favorite examples of photos used as visual references for other works of art. We lawyers don’t know much, but we can learn pretty quickly.

Thanks for any help.”

Is this good, bad, indifferent? I am not really sure, but I know it is easier to find things when a million people are looking for it.

*All my knowledge of copyright comes from Lessig’s books, so I am sure you can guess my opinion. I would love to hear the other side. But beyond my person views, I wonder and would love to get this answered, if Shepard Fairey goes to court and eventually gets found guilty of copyright infringement, wouldn’t “Obama for America” also be guilty of copyright infringement, because they sold the posters? Just wondering.

To explain the incredible journey, which has been the last four years of my life, would be impossible. It was the fall of 2004 when I first heard of a young state senator from Illinois named Barack Obama. At the time, I was working at a TV station in Youngstown and for the first time I was really paying attention to the presidential campaign.

In 2000, I had paid a little attention, but I never really connected the fact that this really affected me. In 2004, I knew it. I knew that we were choosing a president whose decisions and views would affect the future of our country. On the nights of the DNC, my friend Glenn and I got together and watched the speeches. When we saw soon-to-be Senator Barack Obama speak we were both blown away. As matter of fact, we were both, along with I assume most of the country, more impressed by him than the nominee, Sen. John Kerry.

Then election night came along and I was heartbroken. For the first time in my life, I found out that more than half the country did not see the world the same as me. More than half my countrymen didn’t see ending the war as important, didn’t see the assault on civil liberties as wrong, and didn’t seen all the other things the Bush regime did as important to fight against. This blew my mind. It took me a while to recover from that election.

I don’t think I really bounced back until the talk about freshman Senator Barack Obama’s possible presidential run stated surfacing. I was at grad school by this time at Ball State University. I was working on my master’s studying digital media with a focus on political communication. I knew from before the start that the Obama campaign was going to be an amazing case study of new media usage in political communication. So I started tracking him.

I immersed myself in Obama stuff. I read his books. I followed his website. I read news about him and I woke up early on a Saturday morning in February to watch a speech on the steps of the Illinois statehouse that would forever change the trajectory of our country. Over the next four months, I followed his new media campaign and in May wrote my thesis on the effects of new media in the early stages of the 2008 presidential election. In my thesis I basically said Obama’s web presence was going to change how people related to him and of all the campaigns Obama’s overall rhetorical strategy was most easily adaptable to the web.

I then moved to Columbus to work on my Ph.D. and over the summer volunteered for the campaign doing things like phone banking and canvassing. Election night came and I was relieved and amazed when Obama won, but it hadn’t fully sunk in. Honestly, it still hasn’t. For the first time, since I really connected presidential politics to my life, I am going to have a president I agree with, a president who I helped elect, a president who I feel represents and will fight for me and my views.

So now an hour away from the inauguration, I am flooded with emotions. I am excited for this change. I am excited for my country to get better. I love this country with all my heart and I want it to be good, not just for me, but for all Americans. I hope most that our country can move forward. That we can realize that above self and party comes county. I am restored in the hope that our country can work together “to bind up the nation’s wound.”

God bless the United States of America.

I honestly don’t know how everyone is going to fit. It really doesn’t seen like there is a lot of room right in front of the capital and they need to fit at least 20,000 or 30,000 people.