<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NickGeidner.com &#187; publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nickgeidner.com/blog/tag/publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nickgeidner.com/blog</link>
	<description>The blog of an Assistant Professor of Journalism at The University of Tennessee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:55:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Article out.</title>
		<link>http://nickgeidner.com/blog/2009/08/article-out/</link>
		<comments>http://nickgeidner.com/blog/2009/08/article-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holbert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nickgeidner.com/blog/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An invited piece that I co-authored with Prof. Lance Holbert was just published in the latest issue of Communication Studies. Here is the abstract:
This essay makes the argument that political communication researchers would be well served to look to communication theories developed in other communication subfields as a means by which to advance a number [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An invited piece that I co-authored with Prof. Lance Holbert was just published in the latest issue of <em>Communication Studies</em>. Here is the abstract:</p>
<blockquote><p>This essay makes the argument that political communication researchers would be well served to look to communication theories developed in other communication subfields as a means by which to advance a number of different research agendas. A series of events or issues that came to light during the 2008 Presidential election are highlighted and specific theories from communication subfields, other than political communication, are isolated in order to show the utility these theories would bring to political communication scholarship. Five communication subfields are focused on in this essay: Interpersonal communication, persuasion, communication information technology, media effects, and strategic communication. The 2008 election topics covered in this essay include face-to-face political discussions of race and gender, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, YouTube, Saturday Night Live, and lifestyle political campaigning.</p></blockquote>
<p>The full article can be found <a href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~db=all~content=g913496638">here</a>.</p>
<p>APA Citation: Holbert, R. L. &amp; Geidner, N. (2009). The 2008 election: Highlighting the need to explore additional communication sub-fields to advance political communication. <em>Communication Studies, 60,</em> 344-358</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nickgeidner.com/blog/2009/08/article-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

